Section 10.4 Noetherian Rings
“All good things must come to an end.”―Geoffrey Chaucer
Most rings that commutative algebraists naturally want to study are noetherian. Noetherian rings are named after Emmy Noether, who is in many ways the mother of modern commutative algebra.
Definition 10.32. Noetherian Ring.
Suppose is a commutative ring. Then is called a noetherian ring if satisfies the ascending chain condition on ideals.
Theorem 10.33. PIDs are Noetherian.
Proof.
Consider and ascending chain of ideals of it must have the form
Consider which is an ideal of by the argument given in is a PID, for some Since we must have for some Then we see that for all thus for and the chain stabilizes as desired.
[provisional cross-reference: cite]
. Since Corollary 10.34. Fields are Noetherian.
Every field is noetherian.
Exercise 10.35. Quotient Rings Noetherian in Noetherian Rings.
Theorem 10.36. Factorization in Noetherian Domains.
If is a noetherian integral domain, then every non-zero, not-unit element factors into a finite product of irreducible elements.
Proof.
Pick with and If is irreducible, there is nothing to prove. Otherwise, we have for non-units If both are irreducible, the proof is complete. Otherwise, one or both of them factors non-trivially. We may express this conveniently by saying that and such that either and are both non-units or and are both non-units. (E.g., if is irreducible, we could set ) Continuing in the this manner, we form a binary tree with at the top, one level down, one level below that, etc.
We halt the process of building the tree if at some stage all the leaves of the tree are irreducible elements, at which point we will have proven that factors in to a product of the irreducible elements given by these leaves.
We need to rule out the possibility that the process never terminates. If it never terminates, we will have built an infinite binary tree with the property that some route downward through the tree consists of an infinite list of irreducible elements such that for a non-unit and, for each for a non-unit Since is an integral domain, we have and for all (E.g., if then and hence so that contrary to being a non-unit.)
But then we have arrived at an infinite ascending chain of ideals in
which is not possible in a Noetherian ring.
Remark 10.37.
For those mathematicians who refute the Axiom of Choice (though they are few and far between), noetherian rings provide a haven of sorts within the world of algebra. This is because the existence of a maximal ideal is guarenteed in noetherian rings, given that every ascending chain of ideals stabilizes.